دستگاه‌های حیاتی در زندگی انسان The vital machines

به نام خدا

فرض کنیم دستگاهی داریم که خیلی پیشرفته و پیچیده است، خیلی حساس هست و استفاده از اون، برامون خیلی حیاتیه و در نتیجه خیلی مهمه که درست کار کنه و خراب نشه..

Suppose that we have a complicated machine, so sensitive that is absolutely vital to use. Then, it is very important to work properly.

 مثلا فرض کنیم این دستگاه به قلب وصل میشه و بد کار کردن یا خراب شدنش موجب مرگ می‌شه. سوالی که به طور طبیعی برای انسان مطرح میشه اینه که چطوری میشه طرز استفاده از این وسیله رو فهمید؟ با توجه به این‌که دستگاه، خیلی حساس و پیچیده است، عاقلانه نیست که به شیوه‌ی آزمون و خطا پیش بریم. پس راه عاقلانه چیه؟

For example, it should be connected to your heart therefore, its breakdown will cause death. The common question arise is how you can discover its mechanism to use it correctly. Of course, the trial and error method is not advisable. What is the best way?

وقتی یک دستگاه جدید می‌خریم و اون رو از داخل جعبه بیرون می‌آریم، اولین چیزی که بجز خود دستگاه دنبالش می‌گردیم، کتابچه‌ای هست که طرز استفاده از دستگاه رو توضیح داده. این کتابچه معمولا دردستگاه‌های پیچیده‌تر، قطورتر هست و وجودش، ضروری‌تر.

When you buy a new machine and take it out of its box, at first, you look for a handbook or user guide to know how to use the machine. This handbook is thicker and more necessary for more complicated machines. The more complicated machine, the more necessary and thicker handbook is in need.

گاهی اوقات ممکنه بعضی از کاربران نیاز داشته باشند شخص متخصصی، در مورد خود کتابچه براشون توضیحاتی بده.

Sometimes, users need an expert to explain and interpret the handbook.

پس دستگاهی که خیلی پیچیده، حساس و حیاتی باشه، نیاز به یک کتابچه و یک متخصص داره که به ما یاد بدن چطور باید از دستگاه استفاده کرد.

Therefor each complicated, sensitive and vital machine, needs a user guide and an expert person that teach us how to use it.

 اما سوال دوم اینه که کتابچه و متخصص چقدر قابل اعتماد هستند؟ به چه کتابچه و چه متخصصی میشه اعتماد کرد؟

The second natural question arises, is that “which handbook and which person are trustable?”

تقریبا جواب واضحه نه؟ کتابچه‌ای که داخل جعبه هست قابل اعتماده چون شرکت سازنده، یعنی مرجعی که بیش از همه در مورد دستگاه می‌دونه، داخل جعبه قرارش داده و متخصصی قابل عتماد هست که شرکت معرفیش کرده باشه. و البته اگر هرکس طبق تجربیات خودش در مورد کار با دستگاه چیزی بنویسه یا بگه که با نوشته‌ی کتابچه یا گفته‌ی متخصص در تناقض باشه از او نمی‌پذیریم.

The answer is almost clear, isn’t it? The handbook that exists in the box and someone who is identified by the company- someone who hast the most knowledge about the machine- are trustable. Of course, if someone writes about his experiments with such a machine, contradicting with the handbook or the approval experts’ statement will not be accepted.

واضحه نه؟

Isn’t it clear?

هر انسانی، دو تا دستگاه پیچیده و حساس داره که دانستن طرز استفاده ی اون‌ها خیلی حیاتی و مهمه. یکی جسم و دیگری روح که روح پیچیدگی بیشتری داره و نیازش به کتابچه بیشتر.

Each person has two such complicated and sensitive machine that is very vital to know how to use. His “body” and his “spirit”. The most complicated and sensitive and vital machine in our life.

The spirit is more complicated and the existence of its handbook is more necessary.

چرا وقتی نوبت به مهم‌ترین و حساس‌ترین و پیچیده‌ترین دستگاهمون می‌رسه، به هر کتابچه و هر متخصصی با دیده‌ی اعتماد نگاه می‌کنیم و هرچه که متخصصین مورد تایید شرکت سازنده می‌گن، ازشون اثبات می‌خواهیم؟!

Why we trust each handbook or person about these vital machines, while we reject the real experts (senders from Allah) and the real handbook (holly Quran).

یکی از سوالات جدی که توی ذهن  خیلی‌ها هست اینه که آیا در دنیای تکنولوژی، جایی برای دین وجود داره؟

 

 

The Balance

 

چشم حمید به ترازوی قدیمی دو کفه ای افتاد که در گوشه ای از مغازه قرار داشت. با هیجان گفت: از این ترازوها! خیلی وقته اینها دیگه توی هیچ مغازه ای نیست.

Hamid looked at the balance in the corner of the store and said thrilled: wow an ancient balance. There is not such a balance in stores anymore!

شما که ترازوی دیجیتال دارین از ترازوی دو کفه ای چه استفاده ای میکنین؟

You have a digital balance in the store, why you use such a thing still?

-          این، مال مغازه نیست. مال خودمه.

Mohamad said: it doesn’t belong to the store. It’s mine.

تعجب حمید بیشتر شد و پرسید: مال خودت؟! چیکارش میکنی؟

Hamid had been more surprised and asked: what do you do with it?

محمد با آرامش گفت: گذاشتمش جلوی چشمم که هر روز یه چیزی رو بهم یادآوری کنه.

Mohamad said peacefully: I put it in front of my eyes to remind me something every day.

بعد، یک وزنه‌ی یک کیلویی برداشت و به حمید نشون داد.

-           یادت میاد چطوری باهاش اندازه گیری می‌کردیم؟ مثلا اگر میخواستیم یک کیلو برنج داشته باشیم، این وزنه رو توی یک کفه می‌گذاشتیم و برنج رو توی کفه‌ی دیگه میریختیم. بعد، اونقدر به برنج اضافه می‌کردیم که دو تا کفه با هم برابر بشن. این ترازو عقل آدمه. عقل، وسیله‌ی سنجشه. باهاش میشه اندازه گیری کرد. میتونی هر روز بسنجی ببینی چقدر از اونچه که باید باشی فاصله گرفتی. میتونی هر روز از خودت سوال کنی چقدر مبانی فکری تو، از مبنای اصلی فاصله گرفته. بعضی از آدم‌ها مبنای فکریشون اسلام هست؛ مبنای زندگیشون، روش زندگی پیامبر و امامان معصومه. بعضی از آدم‌ها هم مبنای زندگیشون رو مُد قرار می‌دن. مبنای فکریشون رو تفکرات مادی قرار می‌دن.

Then he showed him a weight and said: can you remember how to scale with it? For example if we wanted to have 1 kilogram of rice, we had to put a 1 kilogram weight in one of plates and pour some rice in another until two plates stand across each other. It meant they are equal. This balance is our intellect. Our intellect is the evaluation device. I can evaluate myself with it to find how much I am far from what I should be. I may ask myself how much the distance between my thinking and the true bases is. The basic of thinking of some people is Islam. Their life is upon the prophets’ life. And some people live depend on fashion or material thinking.

حمید، آرام خندید و گفت: من همیشه فکر می‌کردم عقل، برای سنجش کافیه. همیشه فکر می‌کردم عقل، خودش مبناست. چون همیشه شنیده بودم هر چیز رو باید با عقل بسنجی.

Hamid smiled and said: I’ve always thought that the wisdom is enough for scaling and it is the base. Because I had heard that we should scale everything with our wisdom.

-          درست شنیده بودی. اما عقل، وسیله است نه مبنا. پایه و مبنا رو باید انتخاب کنی. هر کس حق داره مبنای خودش رو انتخاب کنه و خوب، هر راهی یک مقصدی داره و اون مقصد، کاملا مشخصه. اگر مبنای اصلی رو درست انتخاب کرده باشی، عقل، میزان انحرافت از راه رو نشون میده و خطاها رو بهت گوشزد می‌کنه. این‌طوری راهت رو اشتباه نمی‌ری. و به مقصدی که انتخاب کردی می‌رسی. به شرط این‌که کارهای خودت رو توجیه نکنی.  

-       You had heard true. But the intellect and wisdom is the device of scaling not the base or weight. You should choose the base. Each person has right to select and choose his way and each way has its own destination, its own clear destination. If you select the true base, your wisdom can show you the measure of your deviance from the selected way. In this way, you will be in the true way and will receive to the selected destination.

The first important letter 4 u

you can download one of the most important letters in the world here.

دریافت
عنوان: Letter 4 u
حجم: 59 کیلوبایت
توضیحات: The most important letter

The second impotrant letter for u

In the name of God, the Beneficent the Merciful

To the Youth in Europe and North America,

The recent events in France and similar ones in some other Western countries have convinced me to directly talk to you about them. I am addressing you, [the youth], not because I overlook your parents, rather it is because the future of your nations and countries will be in your hands; and also I find that the sense of quest for truth is more vigorous and attentive in your hearts.

I don’t address your politicians and statesmen either in this writing because I believe that they have consciously separated the route of politics from the path of righteousness and truth.

I would like to talk to you about Islam, particularly the image that is presented to you as Islam. Many attempts have been made over the past two decades, almost since the disintegration of the Soviet Union, to place this great religion in the seat of a horrifying enemy. The provocation of a feeling of horror and hatred and its utilization has unfortunately a long record in the political history of the West.

Here, I don’t want to deal with the different phobias with which the Western nations have thus far been indoctrinated. A cursory review of recent critical studies of history would bring home to you the fact that the Western governments’ insincere and hypocritical treatment of other nations and cultures has been censured in new historiographies.

The histories of the United States and Europe are ashamed of slavery, embarrassed by the colonial period and chagrined at the oppression of people of color and non-Christians. Your researchers and historians are deeply ashamed of the bloodsheds wrought in the name of religion between the Catholics and Protestants or in the name of nationality and ethnicity during the First and Second World Wars. This approach is admirable.

By mentioning a fraction of this long list, I don’t want to reproach history; rather I would like you to ask your intellectuals as to why the public conscience in the West awakens and comes to its senses after a delay of several decades or centuries. Why should the revision of collective conscience apply to the distant past and not to the current problems? Why is it that attempts are made to prevent public awareness regarding an important issue such as the treatment of Islamic culture and thought?

You know well that humiliation and spreading hatred and illusionary fear of the “other” have been the common base of all those oppressive profiteers. Now, I would like you to ask yourself why the old policy of spreading “phobia” and hatred has targeted Islam and Muslims with an unprecedented intensity. Why does the power structure in the world want Islamic thought to be marginalized and remain latent? What concepts and values in Islam disturb the programs of the super powers and what interests are safeguarded in the shadow of distorting the image of Islam? Hence, my first request is: Study and research the incentives behind this widespread tarnishing of the image of Islam.

My second request is that in reaction to the flood of prejudgments and disinformation campaigns, try to gain a direct and firsthand knowledge of this religion. The right logic requires that you understand the nature and essence of what they are frightening you about and want you to keep away from.

I don’t insist that you accept my reading or any other reading of Islam. What I want to say is: Don’t allow this dynamic and effective reality in today’s world to be introduced to you through resentments and prejudices. Don’t allow them to hypocritically introduce their own recruited terrorists as representatives of Islam.

Receive knowledge of Islam from its primary and original sources. Gain information about Islam through the Qur’an and the life of its great Prophet. I would like to ask you whether you have directly read the Qur’an of the Muslims. Have you studied the teachings of the Prophet of Islam and his humane, ethical doctrines? Have you ever received the message of Islam from any sources other than the media?

Have you ever asked yourself how and on the basis of which values has Islam established the greatest scientific and intellectual civilization of the world and raised the most distinguished scientists and intellectuals throughout several centuries?

I would like you not to allow the derogatory and offensive image-buildings to create an emotional gulf between you and the reality, taking away the possibility of an impartial judgment from you. Today, the communication media have removed the geographical borders. Hence, don’t allow them to besiege you within fabricated and mental borders.

Although no one can individually fill the created gaps, each one of you can construct a bridge of thought and fairness over the gaps to illuminate yourself and your surrounding environment. While this preplanned challenge between Islam and you, the youth, is undesirable, it can raise new questions in your curious and inquiring minds. Attempts to find answers to these questions will provide you with an appropriate opportunity to discover new truths.

Therefore, don’t miss the opportunity to gain proper, correct and unbiased understanding of Islam so that hopefully, due to your sense of responsibility toward the truth, future generations would write the history of this current interaction between Islam and the West with a clearer conscience and lesser resentment.

Seyyed Ali Khamenei
21st Jan. 2015

یک سوال

 

 

همین‌جوری می‌خواستم ببینم چی میگن! برام جالب بود. از خیلی از عراقیا و موکب‌دارا همین سوالو می‌پرسیدم. یکی گفت: همه زندگیمو مدیون حسینم، قول دادم تا آخر عمرم نوکری زائراشو بکنم. یکی‌شون گفت: سیر کردن زائر امام حسین خیلی ثواب داره. یکی گفت خدمت به زائرا، خدمت به امام‌حسینه. اما بین این همه، یه جواب خیلی به دلم نشست...
یه پسر جوونِ سبزه که یه سینی خرما دستش گرفته بود و اول صبح وایساده بود وسط مسیر. سینی رو گرفت سمتم. یه خرما ورداشتم و پرسیدم: چرا برای چند روز از همه زندگی‌ت زدی اومدی اینجا که از زائرا پذیرایی کنی؟ اشک تو چشاش حلقه زد، بغضش رو خورد و با یه صدای گرفته با همون لهجه‌ی عراقی، دست و پا شکسته شروع کرد فارسی صحبت کردن: هرسال همه دل‌خوشیم اینه که فقط یه بار یکی از این خرماها رو به امام‌زمانم تعارف کرده باشم... همین

نقل از پاتوق بچه شیعه‌ها

باز هم همون سوال تکراری به سراغم میاد: برای امام زمانت چیکار کردی؟

و باز هم همون جواب تکراری: هیچ! به معنای واقعی کلمه هیچ!